-
posted by: martijn, at 25 February 2007 23:06 GMT+1, 7 January 2008 22:34 GMT+1
If Flash, Flex, Photoshop etc where ported to Linux I would switch immediately. The last 2 weeks I tried to work in Ubuntu Edgy. Besides all the wonderful applications already installed by the default installation I miss the Adobe products (and default support for my wireless network adapter).
Using Wine is an option but still not stable or fast and getting CS2 to work was undoable (for me that is).
But why isn’t Adobe supporting Linux? Main reason I could find was the diversity of Linux distributions and desktop managers which leads to a diversity in frameworks to choose from like a sound manager alsa or oss etc.
For the Linux distributions part I would suggest that it would a matter of choice because every system can simply adept. For instance the apt-get system of Debian/Ubuntu is also installable on Fedora and vice versa of course.
For the window manager part the same is in order. Choosing KDE as platform that’s no real problem for Gnome or XFCE users because it’s just a matter of installing a framework (could we call gtk and qt like that?). For the flash player Adobe choose Motif as gui framework , I still wonder why.
If Adobe would support Linux I would switch with them and my guess is that there are more like me to do so.
7 Comments
Post a comment
Peter Elst says:
at 25 February, 2007 23:43 www.peterelst.com